ANALISIS HUKUM ATAS TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP TERJADINYA PERBEDAAN SAKSI DALAM SALINAN AKTA DENGAN MINUTA AKTA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN M.A NO. 2468-K/PID/2006)

The result of the research shows that evidence inhered to authentic deed is tangible evidence, formal or material evidence. In this case, Panel Judges Supreme Court use truth content deed, because in their legal opinion, casse, problem not names witnesses. Notary has issued copy with different witnesses from those are specified minute which later becomes a claim complaint person who about made by Notary. Therefore, can be sued and required take responsibility criminal law (if count fulfilled), civil Article 1365 Civil Code state administratuve No. 2/2014 16 paragraph 1. Letter d 12/2014 on Notarial Position fulfilled). Judge hands down Ruling 2468 K/Pid/2006 states rejects cassation appeal appelant, prosecuting attorney public prosecutor District Attorney’s Office Provincial General Surabaya judge his opinion case Deed nit material.Keyword : Notary, Minute, Copy, Liability